News | Stroke | August 09, 2024

Researchers Find Short, Intense Bursts of Exercise More Effective for Stroke Victims Versus Steady, Moderate Exercise

Researchers found repeated one-minute bursts of high-intensity interval training were more effective than traditional, moderate continuous exercise for improving the body’s aerobic fitness after a stroke.


According to research published in Stroke, the peer-reviewed scientific journal of the American Stroke Association,  one-minute, short bursts of high-intensity interval training may be more effective for improving fitness among people six months or more after a stroke than traditional,  moderate-intensity exercise sessions. The American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.

“This study shows that people with stroke can also benefit from high-intensity interval training,” said Kevin Moncion, Ph.D., a physiotherapist who led this study as part of his doctoral studies at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. “With the right support and guidance, stroke survivors can safely and effectively engage in high-intensity interval training, significantly improving their overall health and recovery.”

The conducted was at McGill University in Montreal and McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada  over a 5.5-year period and included stroke survivors between six months to 5 years after a stroke. Researchers randomly grouped participants to receive either three days per week of 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training or three days per week of 12 weeks of traditional moderate exercise sessions. The high-intensity interval training protocol involved ten 1-minute intervals of high-intensity exercise, interspersed with nine 1-minute low-intensity intervals, for 19 minutes total. The moderate intensity continuous training involved 20 to 30 minutes of steady exercise at moderate intensity.

Researchers then compared fitness levels, cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure and stiffness of blood vessels, walking speeds and distances between the two groups. All assessments were repeated one final time 8 weeks after the exercise interventions to evaluate whether the changes were sustained over time.

Researchers found:

  • The high-intensity interval training group’s cardiorespiratory fitness levels (rate of oxygen consumed at peak exercise) improved twice as much as the moderate intensity continuous training group: 3.5 milliliters of oxygen consumed in one minute, per kilogram of body weight (mL/kg/min) compared to 1.7 mL/kg/min.

  • The improvement in the high intensity interval training group stayed above clinically important thresholds even at the 8-week follow-up (1.71 mL/kg/min), whereas the moderate intensity continuous training group did not (0.67 mL/kg/min).

  • Both the high intensity interval training and moderate intensity continuous training groups gained improvement in walking endurance, as measured by distance walked over 6 minutes. At baseline both groups could walk about 355 meters (the approximate distance of three American football fields) over 6 minutes. After 12 weeks of exercise both groups increased their walking distance by 8 meters and after the 8-week follow-up they increased their walking distance by 18 meters.

“This is the first randomized trial to examine a time-efficient, high intensity interval training program to incorporate a phased and progressive approach,” said senior author Ada Tang, Ph.D., a physiotherapist, professor and assistant dean of Rehabilitation Science at McMaster University. “We also used an adaptive recumbent stepper, which we believe allowed more people to participate in high-intensity interval training, even those who cannot walk fast enough or long enough on a treadmill.”

The limitations of the study include that study participants were higher functioning stroke survivors from a physical standpoint who were at lower risk for heart disease. Study minimum criteria included the ability to walk 10 meters without physical assistance of another person, although the use of cane or walker was permitted. Outcome assessments were unblinded at follow-up, which may have influenced results. Lastly, enrollment and exercise for the trial was halted two years for COVID-19 lockdowns, thus inflating the rate of participants who left the study and potentially limiting the statistical power of the analysis.

Click here to access the article.

 


Related Content

News | Stroke

Nov. 16, 2024 Anthos Therapeutics, Inc.recently presented new data at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific ...

Home November 18, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

Oct. 24, 2024 – Royal Philips and Medtronic Neurovascular have announced a strategic advocacy partnership. Delivering ...

Home October 24, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

Sept. 10, 2024 — Royal Philips and the World Stroke Organization (WSO) have published a policy paper calling for a ...

Home September 10, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

Aug. 23, 2024 — A team led by researchers at Yale School of Medicine has created a deep learning model that can ...

Home August 26, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

June 7, 2024 — Access to thrombectomy should be expanded to include patients who experience basilar artery occlusion ...

Home June 07, 2024
Home
Feature | Stroke | By Pamela W. Duncan, PhD

Stroke recovery is a challenging process that extends for months after hospital discharge. Issues like cognitive ...

Home June 04, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

May 20, 2024 — Ochsner Medical Center - Baton Rouge has earned The Joint Commission’s Gold Seal of Approval and the ...

Home May 20, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

May 16, 2024 — A new University of Cincinnati study provides more insight into how few patients have severe ischemic ...

Home May 16, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

May 7, 2024 — A new study by a global team of researchers, led by Sook-Lei Liew, PhD, of USC's Mark and Mary Stevens ...

Home May 07, 2024
Home
News | Stroke

March 5, 2024 — Frequent cannabis smoking may significantly increase a person’s risk for heart attack and stroke ...

Home March 05, 2024
Home
Subscribe Now